In reply to:
Linda Stevens 🌎
@Linda__Stevens
·
116d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
116d
The statement by @Linda__Stevens involves a critique of a public issue, specifically the race for AI supremacy and the involvement of certain parties labeled as 'scammers.' This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant societal and technological debate.
- The statement uses the term 'scammer,' which could be considered harmful or defamatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By labeling certain parties as 'scammers,' the statement could be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory, which may not respect the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather uses a derogatory term, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.