Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 102
1/25/2025, 5:34:24 PM
X
In reply to:
Dean W. Ball
@deanwball
·
118d
People with their own grift and agendas are going to write splashy headlines intended to make the new administration panic, and to attract clicks to their paid newsletters. These people have long lost interest in informing the public; they want attention and money.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
118d
the race to AI supremacy is over (at least for now) - and the US didn’t win.

My analysis coming Sunday at Marcus on AI…

The statement is a defensive response to an accusation of having a financial agenda behind a newsletter. It addresses a public issue indirectly by engaging in a conversation about the motivations behind public commentary on AI and administration policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a confrontational tone, which could be seen as harmful, but it does not directly harm others. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does involve blocking someone, which could be seen as a form of digital exclusion.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it resorts to blocking, which shuts down further conversation. [-2]