Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 95

The statement is part of a conversation about AI supremacy, which is a public issue involving technology and international competition. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and critical, suggesting that some have misunderstood or prematurely judged the situation. The intent seems to be to commend patience and caution in forming opinions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the sarcasm could be perceived as lacking respect. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses more on critiquing others' premature judgments.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of criticism but does not directly attack individuals personally, though it does imply others have made mistakes.