In reply to:
The statement raises a concern about the reliability and potential issues of AI technology, specifically its adoption if it has an 85% reliability rate and the possibility of hallucinations. This engages with public discourse on the implications of AI in business processes, particularly in due diligence for M&A transactions.
- The statement does not cause harm; it raises a valid concern about AI reliability, which is important for informed decision-making.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning the reliability of AI, the statement encourages understanding and consideration of potential risks, promoting a cautious approach. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the reliability of AI without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to responsibly question the implications of AI technology, aligning with free speech principles. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.