Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47

Score 36

@hamandcheese that’s a very weak, entirely ad hominem argument.

like the last one you gave me (re moving goalposts) a few weeks, it is unsupported by a single specific claim.

getting harder to take you seriously, when that’s how you roll.

1/26/2025, 12:47:35 AM

In reply to:

Samuel Hammond 🌐🏛

@hamandcheese

146d

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

147d

Let’s wreck the environment to build an unreliable technology that has made little revenue which China can now build much more efficiently.

The statement critiques another person's argument as ad hominem and unsupported, indicating a focus on the quality of discourse. It suggests a desire for more substantive and specific claims in discussions.

Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the use of ad hominem arguments and the lack of specific claims, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]