Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 96

@navtechai Correct. The negative part of his argument (overlapping with mine) is sharper than the positive part, which is mostly hand-waving.

1/26/2025, 3:02:01 AM

In reply to:

Pablo Navarro

@navtechai

148d

@GaryMarcus I'm not convinced that the next big thing in AI is just around the corner. Sounds like Yann LeCun's 'new paradigm' is just a rehashing of existing ideas.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

148d

Fact: Yann LeCun’s 2025 critique of LLMs sounds almost exactly like the conclusions of Rebooting AI (2019) and my 2020 article Next Decade in AI.

Tsarathustra

@tsarnick

148d

Yann Lecun says within the next 3-5 years we will see the emergence of a new paradigm of AI architectures that don't have the limitations of current systems, leading to a revolution in AI capabilities

The statement is part of a public discourse on the future of AI, engaging in a debate about the validity and originality of proposed AI paradigms. It critiques the argument presented by Yann LeCun, suggesting that the negative aspects of the argument are more compelling than the positive ones.

Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on critiquing the argument without offering constructive insights or alternative perspectives. It is neutral in this regard.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by evaluating the strength of the argument. It does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the content of the argument. [+1]