Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 80
1/26/2025, 10:03:14 AM
X
In reply to:
Professor Bad Trip 🔻
@_profbadtrip
·
150d
@GaryMarcus Here, from January 2018: https://www.facebook.com/yann.le…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
150d
@_profbadtrip Show me; your memory is wrong afaik, and I have receipts of him attacking me through 2018 and 2019.
Professor Bad Trip 🔻
@_profbadtrip
·
150d
@GaryMarcus You're unfair on that one. LeCun at least as early as 2018 has been saying that deep learning is out, and said it would mature into a new programming paradigm called differentiable programming. I actually think he's right.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
151d
Fact: Yann LeCun’s 2025 critique of LLMs sounds almost exactly like the conclusions of Rebooting AI (2019) and my 2020 article Next Decade in AI.
Tsarathustra
@tsarnick
·
151d
Yann Lecun says within the next 3-5 years we will see the emergence of a new paradigm of AI architectures that don't have the limitations of current systems, leading to a revolution in AI capabilities

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a debate on the evolution of AI technologies, specifically deep learning and differentiable programming. It references public figures in the AI field and their opinions, contributing to a broader discussion on the future of AI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on a technical debate.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on a technical critique.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a critique of past statements and opinions, which can be seen as constructive criticism, though it borders on personal critique. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on defending a past position.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in a technical debate responsibly. [+1]