Jill Stien

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 3

The statement critiques the influence of tech billionaires on American society, suggesting they contribute to corruption, lack of competitiveness, and anti-democratic tendencies. It engages with public issues related to economic power, governance, and technological competition, particularly in the context of international AI developments.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does generalize about a group, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is critical and accusatory. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes broad accusations without engaging with specific individuals or arguments. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived societal issues, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory tone. [-1]