Jill Stien

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score 3

The statement criticizes a proposed solution to the conflict in Gaza, framing it as 'US-orchestrated ethnic cleansing.' It uses strong language to express disapproval and concern over the humanitarian implications of relocating Palestinians.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of those involved by labeling the proposal as 'ethnic cleansing,' which is a serious accusation. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on condemnation rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses a personal attack rather than addressing the policy's implications. [-2]