Truth Seeker in Silicon Valley
@truth_in_sv
·
151d
The statement questions why a public figure, Sam Altman, does not engage in public debates about AI, suggesting that his public appearances are controlled and lack genuine discourse. It implies a call for transparency and open discussion in the field of AI, which is a public issue.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it implies criticism of Altman's approach to public engagement.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it is part of a conversation that includes derogatory language. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement calls for public debate, which aligns with constructive dialogue, but it is part of a thread that includes personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by advocating for open debate, but it should be more responsible in tone. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.