Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 71
1/26/2025, 2:56:02 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
153d
@truth_in_sv @sama @HooverInst @erikbryn @landay @Hai @landay we should have asked Wyclef to open :)
Truth Seeker in Silicon Valley
@truth_in_sv
路
153d
@GaryMarcus @sama @HooverInst @erikbryn @landay @Hai 馃挴. In fact James Landay is probably your best shot to facilitate this. I will be happy to help in any way I can -logistics, etc- if this can happen.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
153d
@truth_in_sv @sama @HooverInst @erikbryn @landay @hai could perhaps cohost.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
153d
@truth_in_sv @sama @HooverInst I would fly down for that, if you want to ask them to ask him. Could also get it streamed live by high profile media, get a good neutral moderator like @erikbryn, etc
Truth Seeker in Silicon Valley
@truth_in_sv
路
153d
@GaryMarcus @sama I support such debate and in fact, if it happens and the option exists, I would attend in person! Maybe we can talk to @HooverInst about organizing it?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
153d
Good question! Many people (and eg even major tv networks) have offered to host Altman versus Marcus.

Why indeed won鈥檛 @sama publicly debate this ideas in AI?

The conversation revolves around organizing a public debate on AI, potentially involving notable figures and institutions. The tone is collaborative and constructive, focusing on logistics and participation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm and is focused on organizing a constructive event.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding and dialogue on AI issues.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks.聽[+1]