Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 55
1/26/2025, 5:01:59 PM
X
In reply to:
Thomas G. Dietterich
@tdietterich
·
154d
@GaryMarcus Isn’t modus ponens exactly pattern matching?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
154d
So much for “reasoning” in o1 pro.

If you don’t understand transitivity, you are pattern-matching, not reasoning.
Dan Mac
@daniel_mac8
·
154d
@slow_developer asked o1 pro it says we end up with a logical loop 😂

The statement is part of a technical discussion about logical reasoning and transitivity in AI models. It critiques the logical consistency of claims about AI reasoning capabilities, highlighting a circular reasoning issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is focused on a technical critique. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about logical reasoning. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]