In reply to:
Robert Maciejko
@4Maciejko
·
155d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of Meta's actions on US AI leadership and economic value. It suggests a need for Congressional investigation, indicating a call for accountability and oversight.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm to US economic interests, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on corporate actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the potential consequences of open-sourcing AI technology. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by suggesting a Congressional investigation rather than resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.