Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
157d
Meta doesn’t just look clueless, they look like they sold out the US.
1/26/2025, 10:40:50 PM
X
In reply to:
Robert Maciejko
@4Maciejko
·
157d
@APazyryk @gpdawson @GaryMarcus That’s not the point.

DeepSeek is primitive compared to multimodal agentic AI that is coming

If Meta keeps sharing in the same way on next generations, China will leapfrog the US as it did here.
Altai Pazyryk
@APazyryk
·
157d
@4Maciejko @gpdawson @GaryMarcus The US can now easily copy what it needs from DeepSeek. Not hard.
Robert Maciejko
@4Maciejko
·
157d
@gpdawson @GaryMarcus By lowering US share of AI leadership? Please explain how losing is winning
Graham Dawson
@gpdawson
·
157d
@4Maciejko @GaryMarcus Yes. So China open-sourcing their advances over what Zuch open-sourced is a huge win for US.
Robert Maciejko
@4Maciejko
·
157d
@gpdawson @GaryMarcus China has a stated goal of dominating global AI over the US. It's not about economics for them. They are thrilled that Yann LeCun and a16z are promoting their models.

He who controls the AI controls the world.
Graham Dawson
@gpdawson
·
157d
@4Maciejko @GaryMarcus If Zuck open-sourcing was some kind of inappropriate gift to non-US world powers - then Chinese open-sourcing their own major innovations must be their inappropriate gift to non-Chinese world powers - and an even bigger one considering it is much more advanced

The conversation involves a discussion on AI leadership, open-sourcing, and geopolitical implications, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical and speculative about the impact of open-sourcing AI technologies on global power dynamics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about geopolitical shifts in AI leadership, which could be seen as promoting awareness rather than harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects privacy but could be seen as indirectly critical of certain entities, though not in a harassing manner. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The discussion could promote understanding of the complexities of AI geopolitics, though it lacks empathy or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is critical but does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on the implications of actions by companies and countries. [+1]