Gary Marcus

The statement and related conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the implications of open-sourcing AI technology and its impact on national advantage. The tone is critical and suggests urgency in addressing perceived strategic missteps by Meta.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement implies harm by suggesting that open-sourcing undermines national advantage, but it does not directly harm individuals.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech, but it could be seen as questioning the integrity of individuals involved.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement calls for accountability and dialogue, aligning with constructive criticism, but it uses strong language that could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]