Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/27/2025, 1:21:28 AM
X
In reply to:
Dominick Romano
@dromanocpm
·
159d
@GaryMarcus If anyone needs to be called in, its Sam Altman who should have beat Zuck to the punch and the investors in Silicon Valley who colluded to prop him up while squatting billions in capital which could have gone to real research on diverse architectures. Instead we got a SaaS...
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
159d
Congress needs to bring in Zuckerberg and LeCun to discuss how their unilateral open-sourcing decision rapidly undermined the US advantage in Generative AI.

Tomorrow.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
159d
Meta doesn’t just look clueless, they look like they sold out the US.

The statement is a dismissive remark suggesting someone should be fired, likely in response to perceived failures in leadership or decision-making. It lacks constructive criticism and does not engage in a meaningful dialogue about the issues at hand.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it calls for someone to be fired without constructive reasoning. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of others, as it dismisses an individual without engaging in a respectful dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive criticism and does not engage in a meaningful dialogue, instead opting for a personal attack. [-1]