Michael Schellenberger

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -50

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the release of information related to COVID-19's origins and alleged governmental actions. It implies a critique of the timing of pardons and the release of information, suggesting a possible cover-up.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies wrongdoing, which could contribute to public distrust. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but questions the integrity of public figures, which is a common aspect of public discourse.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement implies criticism of governmental actions but does not engage in personal attacks.