Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement is part of a public discourse on the implications of open-sourcing AI technology and its impact on national advantage. The reply uses an ad hominem attack, which detracts from constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement violates the principle of doing no harm by using an ad hominem attack, which can be harmful to the discourse. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in personal attacks rather than addressing the argument. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism and dialogue, opting instead for a personal attack. [-1]