Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/27/2025, 3:13:33 AM
X
In reply to:
Prabal Singh
@PrblSing
·
162d
@GaryMarcus Bold claims like this often spark skepticism, but pushing boundaries is how progress happens. If there’s a chance to validate it, I’d love to see the data behind these projections!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
162d
Dario Amodei, I hereby offer you $100,000 against this bet, proceeds to charity.

Are you in?

Your claim is absolutely insane; there is no way you can do the lab work that fast. It’s just totally made up BS.
Chubby♨️
@kimmonismus
·
162d
Longevity is here. And its here to stay.

We have to remember that Dario Amodei is not a hype-guy. He is a serious scientist. His words carry weight.

Doubling the lifespan would probably amount to around 140 years. In 5 years already, mind you!

So where will we be in 10 years'…

The statement expresses skepticism about the validity of projections related to AI and human lifespan extension. It challenges the thoroughness of the claims by pointing out a perceived oversight in lab work.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but dismisses the projections without detailed evidence, which could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive elements or evidence to support its skepticism, potentially reducing the quality of discourse. [-1]