In reply to:
Andres Perez
@AndresP45839447
·
162d
The statement by @AndresP45839447 engages in a public discourse by addressing a claim about government funding, which is a public issue. The tone is dismissive and suggests a need for further reading, indicating a disagreement with the previous statement.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the previous claim without providing evidence or engaging in a meaningful discussion, which could be seen as a minor violation of the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.