In reply to:
Bunagaya
@Bunagayafrost
·
164d
The statement is dismissive and sarcastic, questioning the expertise of an individual in the context of a discussion about medical research and longevity claims. It engages in a public debate about the credibility of claims made by public figures.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the individual's expertise without constructive engagement, potentially undermining their credibility. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in a dismissive tone that could be perceived as belittling. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to sarcasm rather than addressing the argument with evidence or reasoned critique. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.