Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/27/2025, 5:24:22 AM
X
In reply to:
Kristen Ruby
@sparklingruby
·
166d
@4Maciejko @GaryMarcus Zuckerberg’s move with Llama was not the nail in the coffin for United States AI leadership. It was the framework U.S. companies should have followed. He didn’t wipe out economic value for The United States. He made our value stronger.
Robert Maciejko
@4Maciejko
·
167d
@GaryMarcus Some solid points here, Gary, but I think you buried the real story. Meta open-sourcing Llama may have been the nail in the coffin for US AI leadership. Zuckerberg’s move likely wiped out trillions in potential economic value for the US. The most urgent issue 🚨? He’s selfishly…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
167d
The race for "AI Supremacy" is over — at least for now.

And the US didn’t win.

Weekend long read on what all that means, politically & technically.

• What does this mean for OpenAI, StarGate & Nvidia?
• How did China manage to catch up so quickly?
• Is this race a good…

The statement is part of a discussion on the impact of Meta's open-sourcing of Llama on U.S. AI leadership and economic value. It questions the claim that this move strengthened U.S. value, engaging in a debate about the strategic implications of AI development and open-source policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and seeks clarification, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By asking for clarification, the statement promotes understanding and encourages further discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning a point without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]