Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by critiquing the exaggerated claims made by tech CEOs, drawing a parallel with Elizabeth Holmes' infamous promises about Theranos. The tone is sarcastic and critical, aiming to highlight the absurdity of current tech industry claims.
- The statement uses sarcasm but does not appear to cause harm directly, though it could be seen as mocking.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does mock public figures.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to critique public figures, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.