In reply to:
Ron
@FieldTechFixer
·
352d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the origins of COVID-19 and the role of technology in international relations, which are significant public issues. The tone suggests a speculative stance on the lab leak theory and implies a critical view of Meta's role in technological advancement in China.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could contribute to misinformation if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it implies a negative view of China, which could be seen as problematic. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a speculative theory without fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a presumption without evidence or engagement with differing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible by providing evidence or fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.