Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the performance of a language model in the context of chess, highlighting its limitations in specialized domains. It aims to inform and educate the audience about the challenges faced by advanced language models when applied to specific tasks.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on providing an objective assessment of the model's performance. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the limitations of language models in specialized domains, encouraging a realistic view of their capabilities. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the language model without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By sharing insights about the limitations of language models, the statement uses its influence to inform and potentially improve societal understanding of AI technology. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss the capabilities and limitations of language models, contributing to public discourse on AI. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.