Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
1/27/2025, 3:30:03 PM
X
In reply to:
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
353d
@GaryMarcus A crash implies a lack of demand. That's not happening. Why would DeepSeek's app rise to #1 if there's less demand? There is greater demand now and it'll keep increasing as people discover its utility.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
353d
@IntuitMachine The problem is that LLMs aren’t that smart, and the commodification is like gonna lead to a crash, and then perhaps an AI winter, before we get to the finish line.
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
353d
@GaryMarcus Intelligence as a commodity is a good thing. How is it not?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
353d
Satya is right that LLM usage will become a commodity (as I myself said last year).

But will there be any profits there? What’s the business model?
Satya Nadella
@satyanadella
·
354d
Jevons paradox strikes again! As AI gets more efficient and accessible, we will see its use skyrocket, turning it into a commodity we just can't get enough of. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the economic implications of AI commodification, specifically addressing the potential for profit loss. It engages with public discourse by discussing the economic and business aspects of AI technology, which are significant public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual assertion about economic outcomes, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a point of disagreement regarding economic outcomes. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]