In reply to:
RyanRejoice
@sonicshifts
·
354d
The statement and its context engage in public discourse by discussing the credibility and claims of tech CEOs, touching on issues of honesty, technological promises, and public perception.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as critical of tech CEOs.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does criticize public figures.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses humor and sarcasm, which may not promote understanding or empathy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question the integrity of tech promises, which can be seen as contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to question public claims responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.