The statement expresses criticism of a decision to remove affordable housing requirements from a development project, suggesting that such community benefits are often neglected in large projects. The tone is critical and accusatory, targeting those responsible for approving the project and implying a failure to uphold promises.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language to criticize decision-makers.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use accusatory language.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes a group of decision-makers without engaging in dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a societal issue, advocating against tax giveaways and broken promises. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a critical opinion on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.