Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses substantive issues related to the US Patent and Trademark Office, including the backlog of patent applications and alleged abuses by China. It reflects Howard Lutnick's commitments during a confirmation hearing, which is a public and civic matter.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on policy issues rather than personal attacks.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of Lutnick's policy priorities, though it could be more empathetic in addressing international relations.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on policy issues, which aligns with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By addressing the backlog and alleged abuses, the statement uses influence to propose improvements in the patent system, which could benefit society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing public policy issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.