The statement discusses the comparative number of STEM graduates between China and the U.S., attributing China's higher numbers to a focus on competitiveness and critiquing 'woke victimhood culture.' It suggests a shift in academic priorities to enhance competitiveness.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by framing diversity efforts negatively, which might undermine efforts to create inclusive environments. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of those advocating for diversity, potentially engaging in dismissive rhetoric. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards diversity initiatives, focusing instead on competition. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a critique of diversity efforts but does so in a way that could be seen as dismissive rather than constructive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.