The statement expresses a desire for the list of banned individuals to grow and for the 'revolving door' between government and former officials to close, indicating a stance on national security and government integrity.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative view of the individuals involved, which could be seen as harmful to their reputations. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on exclusion rather than dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it does not provide reasons or engage with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a policy change, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment, but lacks a constructive approach.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could use more responsible and constructive language.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.