The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of federal budget spending and the national debt crisis. It challenges the claims of experts and suggests a solution by comparing past and current spending levels.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it could be seen as dismissive of expert opinions, which might indirectly contribute to misinformation or misunderstanding.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement challenges expert opinions but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It presents a viewpoint that could be part of a constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question government spending and expert opinions, which is a responsible use of a platform to engage in civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.