Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of U.S. education spending and performance, suggesting a policy change by shutting down the Department of Education. It critiques the current education system and references a political figure's stance, contributing to civic dialogue on education reform.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but the suggestion to shut down the Department of Education could have significant implications for public education.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive solutions. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive dialogue either, as it presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for a significant policy change, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment, but lacks a balanced perspective.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, but the integrity of the argument could be improved with more nuanced discussion.