Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of distinguishing between peaceful assembly and violent insurrections, referencing both historical and current political contexts. It critiques the actions of a public figure and implies a comparison between different political systems.
- The statement does not directly incite harm, but the tone is confrontational and could contribute to divisive rhetoric. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does make a pointed reference to apartheid South Africa, which could be seen as disrespectful to those affected by that regime. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critiquing and drawing comparisons. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be seen as dismissive or mocking, rather than constructive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not fully uphold the responsibility and integrity expected in public discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.