Vivek Ramaswamy

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the role of federal government in education, advocating for decentralization and state control. It suggests policy changes such as shutting down the U.S. Department of Education and implementing universal school choice, which are substantive public issues.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of federal roles without considering potential negative impacts on education equity.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks elements that promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on policy changes without addressing diverse educational needs. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not invite dialogue or constructive criticism, presenting a unilateral view.
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to advocate for policy changes, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment, though it lacks a comprehensive view of potential consequences. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by expressing a viewpoint on public policy, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be questioned due to the lack of nuanced discussion.