The statement advocates for the reinstatement of the Pledge of Allegiance and the national anthem in classrooms, which touches on public discourse related to education policy, national identity, and civic practices.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as controversial, as it may not consider diverse perspectives on national symbols.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a directive without engaging with differing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without addressing potential disagreements. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a societal change, but it does not provide a rationale for how this change benefits society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue, but it lacks a responsible engagement with opposing views.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.