Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement involves a public figure and an action taken by a former president, which could be considered part of public discourse as it relates to the functioning of a public office and the dismissal of a public official.
- The statement is neutral and does not appear to cause harm with words or actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individual by thanking her for her service and not engaging in derogatory language. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is neutral in tone.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of a mistake being acknowledged or corrected in the statement.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not explicitly use influence for societal betterment, but it is a factual report of an event.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly reporting an event without bias or inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.