Michael Schellenberger

Rank 36 of 47

Score -62

-5

Naturally, they accuse Trump of causing a constitutional crisis when they’re the ones brazenly violating the separation of powers. Just like it was the “progressives” who sought to pack the Supreme Court. It’s all projection all the time with them.

2/8/2025, 3:16:50 AM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

277d

The members of Congress are saying they’re entitled to enter the building because they are members of Congress. Nope. That’s not what our Constitution says.

Left-wing authoritarianism overlaps exactly with narcissism. That’s what’s on display above. Most obnoxious people in DC

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

277d

The American people elected Trump and he has authority over the Dept of Ed, not Congress. Its oversight duties don’t mean its members can storm executive branch buildings. Radicalized members, not Trump, are the ones threatening the separation of powers.

The statement criticizes certain political actions and accuses a group of hypocrisy, using a confrontational tone. It engages in public discourse by discussing constitutional issues and political behavior.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses accusatory language, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating this principle. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in name-calling and broad generalizations, violating this principle. [-2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses ad hominem attacks, violating this principle. [-2]