Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement addresses the public issue of NIH funding cuts and their impact on research institutions in Alabama, highlighting a senator's response to the situation. It engages with public discourse by discussing the implications of policy decisions on local institutions and employment.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a constructive approach to addressing funding cuts. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By highlighting the need for a 'smart, targeted approach,' the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the affected institutions and communities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, instead focusing on constructive dialogue and potential collaboration. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to an important societal issue, potentially influencing public opinion and policy. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing the impact of funding cuts and advocating for a thoughtful response. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.