In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
275d
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing government efficiency, job justification, and the qualifications of individuals involved in government assessment. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, suggesting skepticism about the actions and qualifications of those involved.
- The statement uses a sarcastic tone, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but questions the qualifications of individuals, which could be seen as a critique of their professional capabilities rather than a violation of privacy or dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of the New York Times and the individuals involved, but it does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on the actions and qualifications of those involved.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.