In reply to:
Ana Paula Henkel
@AnaPaulaVolei
·
275d
The statement and linked content engage in public discourse by discussing the role of the U.S. government and its agencies in international affairs, specifically regarding censorship and aid. It raises concerns about the influence of U.S. entities in Brazil and the impact of USAID funding cuts on global aid efforts.
- The statement raises concerns about censorship and government influence, which could be seen as promoting transparency and accountability, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or harassment, respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By questioning the role of U.S. agencies, the statement could promote understanding and dialogue about international relations and aid. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue and investigation into the issues raised, which aligns with constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.