In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
321d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
329d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the role of USAID in supporting independent media and the implications of its funding decisions. It addresses issues of press freedom, government influence, and political actions related to media funding.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by government influence on media, suggesting a violation of this principle. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the integrity of USAID's actions, potentially impacting the privacy and dignity of those involved, which may violate this principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism of USAID's actions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of USAID and Trump, but it lacks constructive dialogue, potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to critique government actions, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.