Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement is a call to action addressing public issues related to government funding priorities, specifically criticizing the allocation of funds to the Pentagon over essential services. It aims to engage the public in a debate about budgetary decisions and encourages participation in a campaign to redirect funds.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it does accuse public figures of illegal actions without providing evidence, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the need to invest in communities, but it could be more effective by providing specific examples or data. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does accuse individuals of illegal actions, which could be seen as an ad hominem argument if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by calling for investment in communities. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in public discourse about budget priorities, but it should ensure accuracy and integrity in its claims. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.