The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues of government transparency and accountability regarding significant public concerns such as Covid, JFK, Epstein, and UAPs. It suggests that past presidents have been dishonest and highlights a promise of disclosure by Trump and a public figure, Anna Paulina, indicating a call for greater transparency.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it implies dishonesty by past presidents, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does accuse past presidents of lying, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on accusations and promises of disclosure without fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes accusations without providing evidence or engaging with opposing views. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for transparency, which could be seen as an attempt to better society, but it lacks constructive engagement.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but could use its platform more responsibly by providing evidence or fostering dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.