Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
322d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
321d
The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing government transparency and the disclosure of historical information, such as the JFK assassination. The tone suggests a call for accountability and transparency from the government.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm and seeks to inform the public, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging the disclosure of information, which can foster empathy and compassion through increased transparency. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the need for disclosure without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment through increased transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.