The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses the issue of government audits and the qualifications of those conducting them, which is a matter of public concern. The tone is critical and skeptical, questioning the legitimacy of the audit team by highlighting their lack of relevant qualifications.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of the audit team, which could be seen as undermining their credibility.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it questions the professional integrity of the audit team.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on discrediting the audit team rather than fostering dialogue.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions, and it could be seen as a personal attack on the audit team's qualifications.
[-1]