Jake Tapper

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 116

The statement involves a political accusation by Sen. Durbin against Patel, which is a substantive engagement with public issues, specifically concerning the operations of the FBI and political influence. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses concerns about governance and accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to public concern or distrust if not substantiated.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it involves a serious accusation that could affect the dignity of the accused. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory in nature. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is an accusation without evidence provided in the statement itself. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to bring attention to a potential issue within the FBI, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by ensuring accountability. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by addressing a public concern, but the responsibility and integrity depend on the evidence supporting the accusation. [+1]