Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement criticizes the Trump administration for allegedly punishing journalists who do not comply with state-mandated terminology, framing it as an attack on press freedom and a violation of the First Amendment. It argues that such actions constitute viewpoint discrimination.
- The statement aims to highlight a potential harm to press freedom, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government actions, avoiding personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses its platform to advocate for press freedom, aiming to better society by upholding constitutional rights. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.