In reply to:
Devan Hadlock
@DevanHadlock
·
130d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
131d
Devan Hadlock
@DevanHadlock
·
131d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
131d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the effectiveness and qualifications of individuals making governmental decisions, particularly in the context of perceived corruption and the need for decisive action. The tone is skeptical and challenges the assumption that a group of individuals without government experience can effectively address complex issues.
- The statement does not use harmful language but questions the qualifications of individuals, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning assumptions and encouraging a deeper look into the qualifications needed for effective governance. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the assumptions of another participant without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.