In reply to:
Ragcast
@ragcast
·
148d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
148d
The statement is part of a conversation that involves public figures and touches on the theme of accusations and facts, which can be related to public discourse. The tone is skeptical and questions the validity of the 'facts' mentioned, implying a critique of the information being shared.
- The statement questions the validity of the facts without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, which aligns with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to question the integrity of the information being shared, which aligns with the responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.